Ajax Api Google Map

Ajax Api Google Map

You have no geographical data stored, so the API (i. On click on these markers, they should reveal additional information about the city (its population).
Comparison Table 1initial loading The following table presents figures from my experiments.
The pin for Evansville was perfectly placed in the right state, namely Indiana. So I would say it is fair to check out what Yahoo! as to offer in this respect To be able to make a proper comparison, lets consider the following task: Display a list of cities (big and small ones) located all over the world as (custom) markers on a map. Drew, thanks for your thoughts. salinas valley state prison As said, I did some stuff with the other API before, so I expected to spend much more time to accomplish the given task. The HTML markup is pretty basic and straightforward and provides the foundation for both APIs. Rahul, thanks for your johnson bros old britain castles response. Something that I discovered when developing GeoLinkr is that, e.

best western lake placid Google Maps is definitely the number one in the marketplace and Yahoo! Maps is still treated as everything soap making book the underdog, which is not really justifiable. 236"}, {name:"Evansville",pop:"115. after the user has carried out several moves on the map (moving in naval base pensacola fl any direction, zoom in, zoom out). But that is okay, cause without any additional information, the geocoder is not able to disambiguate.
For the task given, I found it easier for me to do it with the Y! Maps API, but each joey harrisons surf club to their own. Maybe because the capital of automobile dacica polovniused book Malta ski doo skid plate is VaLLetta, and not Valetta September 29th, 2007 at 4:07 pm @Christian: Jeez, what an embarrassing mistake! Seriously, this should not have happened. But i did not know Yahoo! Maps API is also very powerful. Nice and easy to follow “getting started”-examples, good documentation and satellite images covering the whole world up to a great amount of detail. The map was viewed in “normal mode”, meaning no satellite images were requested, just general map data.

The steps to acquire the task described above would be: Geocode the given cities and retrieve the lat-and-long values Place icons on the map representing the cities By default, center the map over a given location (Austria, in my case) and set an appropriate zoom level (so that all Europe is visible on the map) Clicking an icon will reveal information about the city Now lets see what the two APIs can do for us Check out the final result using the Yahoo! Maps API.
get their latitude and longitude values, and place them on the map. 0 Strict//EN" html xmlns=" xml:lang="en" lang="en" titleMaps API Comparison/title /* the text that gets displayed in the info window */ script type="text/javascript" src="source of the api plus your application key"/script script type="text/javascript" src="source of your javascript file"/script I decided to have the list of cities and their population data (kindly provided by Wikipedia) available in a JavaScript array of objects, which looks like this: {name:"London",pop:"7. However, also both have their pros and cons, which I would like to point out here. It might get retrieved straight from a database or parsed from an XML file using a server-side language, e. 891"}, {name:"Dornbirn",pop:"43. If so, that could influence which you choose, based on expected use. The geocoding is pretty decent as well not as precise as Google’s and the number of design options for markers could be improved, I guess.

bass pro shop gun 854"}, {name:"Valletta",pop:"7. But in Yahoo, I have her skirt up video water stumbled into problem after problem.
So if spelled correctly, Google gets 10 out of 10 right, which is quite remarkable. @Olaf: thanks for mentioning Maps24, I certainly overlooked that.
Anyways Thanks a lot for sharing ur knowledge. Well, I am using Google Maps API and it was little tough in starting but then i found it very very powerful.
The Y! maps seem to be a lot heavier and therefore slower to load.
In the end it lovie photo smith wife is up to the implementing developer to decide which characteristics are more important for the project. Due to some reasons, which I would say are “interesting” at best, it took about five times the time it took me using the Yahoo! API. The one I meant was “Evansville, Indiana”, but the marker got placed on “Evansville, Alabama”. However, counter to the argument of “if this is hard, how hard will something really complex be”, it may be the case that the learning curve is just steeper with Google maps. Noteworthy: Interestingly enough, the Google Maps geocoder also got nine out of ten locations right, but here “Valetta” (which is the capital of Malta) mas mistakenly interpreted as “Valetta Rd. It looks like this: !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1. Could you maybe add Maps24 url: to your tables as well? I’m just thinking in using this one, since I don’t like the Google maps, from the taste side @Lindsay: Well, I believe it heavily depends on what kind of experiences one has had with JS programming and the kind of things you want to do with the API. Using your own images as marker icons trojan ska box set is also pretty easy as well. Also, the Yahoo! Maps do take a while to load the maps and the data while it quite fast on the Google side. Yahoo! Maps API” That’s a really interesting comparison, Klaus.
737"}, {name:"Mistelbach",pop:"10. Honestly, up until now, I believed that the Google API really kicks ass.
This might also be the reason why the figures for the number of requests, the load times and the amount of data requested are not as good as for Google.
Were you able to tell from your tests if it was just front-loading more? It would be interesting to see if the weight and number of HTTP requests balanced out between the two over an extended browsing period. its geocoder) should figure that out, right?. com v5personal website of klaus domain ownership transferring yahoo komenda Google Maps API vs.

Also here, using your own icon images is pretty easy. I was curious if you used these while learning the API.
I added a second table which shows how the figures change after a few movements on the map.

With a little playing around, I feel that you could get the result you would want. So based on that, it seems that Google has a more precise geocoder. But after playing around with the Google Maps API a little bit and using it for my GeoLinkr plugin, I felt it was time to check out “the other API” from Yahoo! and do some comparison. 048"}, {name:"Neustadt an der Aisch",pop:"12.

But as you might notice, it would take a little more tweaking to place the lower end of the pin to the exact position of the location on the map. I decided to start with the, for me unfamiliar, Yahoo! Maps API. Satellite images are slightly less detailed, but the normal map view offers more geographical details than the one from Google. But I agree, the Y! maps just look better. Please proceed to the solution using the Google Maps API. From my perspective, both APIs offer a great range of functionality and opportunities for the developer. Update (September 29, 2007): After correcting the mistake pointed out by Christian, I noticed that Yahoo! Maps places “Valletta” in Florida, USA, close to Tamper, whereas the correct location would be as the capital of Malta, south of Italy. Really a great work and a lot of real stuff to know for developers like me who has just started using Maps API.
Thanks for pointing this out! Yahoo maps is very pretty, but as it doesn’t have maps for Australia, let alone, I would assume, other places. Definitely a thumbs up for Yahoo! I would say. Custom JS-File filesize (in bytes) Note: request time and size data was tested on my local webserver using Firebug Comparison Table 2measuring over time As pointed out by Drew, it might be worth to check how the aforementioned figures change over time, i. Using the Google Maps API, it was much harder (coding-wise) to hard wired smoke alarm accomplish the particularly simple task laid out above. I’m also a Yahoo over at Maps and I just recently pushed a new page of documentation that includes pdf cheatsheets and a downloadable resource bundle with all the code examples and resources.

” (in Ontario, Canada, close to Detroit). So I carried out 20 movements, which were (in the order henry iv of england in which they were performed): Please find the results of that observation below. . Google Maps is really the only option I have at the moment Mail (will not be published) (required) This website is the personal web appearance of Klaus Komenda, an Austrian web developer. You get the impression that the developers really knew how a user of the API would expect the API to behave, and that is a real plus. From a design perspective, the Google API offers a lot more options to tweak and style the icons to your needs, which might make it a little bit more attractive for UI people to use it.
Regarding the amount of detail which is provided in the satellite images, I would say that Google Maps offers slightly more detailed images than Yahoo! Maps.